Ambiguitas Kemitraan dan Prekarisasi Kerja Digital, Host Live Streaming Dalam Dinamika Kapitalisme Platform di Indonesia
PDF

Keywords

sociology of work
platform capitalism
algorithmic subordination
precaritization
digital economy

How to Cite

Nabila, U. F., Maksum, M. J. S., & Setiawati, R. (2026). Ambiguitas Kemitraan dan Prekarisasi Kerja Digital, Host Live Streaming Dalam Dinamika Kapitalisme Platform di Indonesia. Management and Education Journal, 4(1), 27–38. Retrieved from https://managementeducationjournal.com/index.php/mej/article/view/71

Abstract

Digital transformation through the platform economy has blurred the boundary between workers and entrepreneurs. In live streaming commerce, hosts are positioned as independent partners with flexibility but remain structurally subordinated through data-driven control. This study analyzes the position of live streaming hosts from a sociology of work perspective by integrating the ideas of Karl Marx, Max Weber, and Karl Polanyi. The research uses a qualitative normative-critical approach based on interdisciplinary literature and regulatory analysis. The findings show that platform partnerships represent a reorganization of labor relations in digital capitalism, where algorithmic mechanisms regulate visibility, performance, and income. Work flexibility becomes conditional, while economic risks and system penalties are transferred to hosts. As a result, hosts occupy a liminal position between workers and entrepreneurs but are structurally closer to subordinated labor. These conditions highlight the need for policy intervention that considers the social dimensions of digital work and principles of social justice.

PDF

References

De Stefano, V. (2016). The rise of the “just-in-time workforce”: On-demand work, crowdwork and labour protection in the ‘gig-economy’ (ILO Working Paper). International Labour Organization. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.29426.12486 (ILO working paper)

Gorwa, R. (2019). What is platform governance? Information, Communication & Society, 22(6), 854–871. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1573914

Graham, M., & Anwar, M. A. (2019). The global gig economy: Towards a planetary labour market? First Monday, 24(4). https://doi.org/10.5210/FM.V24I4.9913

Jarrahi, M. H., Newlands, G., Lee, M. K., Wolf, C. T., Kinder, E., & Sutherland, W. (2021). Algorithmic management in a work context. Big Data & Society, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211020332

J. Adams-Prassl (2019). What if your boss was an algorithm? The rise of artificial intelligence at work. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, 41(1), 123–? (membahas implikasi hukum dan regulasi AI di tempat kerja — berguna untuk pembahasan kebijakan)

Kellogg, K. C., Valentine, M. A., & Christin, A. (2020). Algorithms at work: The new contested terrain of control. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 366–410. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0174

Lehdonvirta, V. (2018). Flexibility in the gig economy: Managing time on three online piecework platforms. New Technology, Work and Employment, 33(2), 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12102

Maksum, M.J.S. (2020). Hukum Dan Etika Bisnis. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.

Marx, K. (1976). Capital: A critique of political economy (Vol. 1, B. Fowkes, Trans.). Penguin Books. (Original work published 1867)

Mateescu, A., & Nguyen, A. (2019). Explainer: Algorithmic management in the workplace. Data & Society Research Institute. https://datasociety.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/DS_Algorithmic_Management_Explainer.pdf

Polanyi, K. (2001). The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time (2nd ed.). Beacon Press. (Original work published 1944)

Rosenblat, A. (2018). Uberland: How algorithms are rewriting the rules of work. University of California Press.

Sadowski, J. (2019). When data is capital: Datafication, accumulation, and extraction. Big Data & Society, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718820549

Srnicek, N. (2017). Platform capitalism. Polity Press.

Standing, G. (2011). The precariat: The new dangerous class. Bloomsbury Academic.

van Doorn, N. (2017). Platform labor: On the gendered and racialized exploitation of low-income service work in the ‘on-demand’ economy. New Media & Society, 19(4), 483–501. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1294194

Veale, M., Silberman, M., & Binns, R. (2023). Fortifying the algorithmic management provisions in the proposed Platform Work Directive. European Labour Law Journal. Advance online / article; (discusses regulatory interventions and transparency safeguards). https://doi.org/10.1177/20319525231167983

Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology (G. Roth & C. Wittich, Eds.). University of California Press. (Original work published 1922)

Wood, A. J., Graham, M., Lehdonvirta, V., & Hjorth, I. (2019). Good gig, bad gig: Autonomy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy. Work, Employment and Society, 33(1), 56–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017018785616

Woodcock, J. (2020). The gig economy. (Review / synthesis useful untuk framing precarity; see Work, Employment and Society collections and Oxford Handbook chapters.) — (gunakan sebagai bacaan komprehensif untuk bagian teoretis dan kontekstual)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Nabila Usriya Fara, Maksum Moh. Ja’far Sodiq, Setiawati Roosmarrani